The Pragmatism and Idealism of the Georgian-American Partnership
David Batashvili, Research Fellow at the Rondeli Foundation
It is clear enough in the middle of this year 2020 that the world will not be an easygoing place for quite a while. Even before the current crisis, it was evident that the geopolitical competition was as much a thing as it had been in all prior eras of human civilization and that history was very much alive and kicking. The pandemic and the accompanying global economic crisis have further underscored this reality. If history is any indicator, the crisis will likely exacerbate existing geopolitical tensions. The world is dangerous and becoming more so.
International partnerships gain additional significance in times like this. Certainly Georgia, embattled both strategically and politically, will need all the support it can get from its foreign friends and partners to weather the difficult months and years ahead. Among these friends and partners, the United States is a critically important one due to its unique combination of the capability to help Georgia and the willingness to do so that stems from America’s own interests and foreign policy outlook.
Russia’s continued aggression and Georgia’s own internal political troubles are a dangerous blend. The informal governance in Georgia and all of the things that come with it cause the danger of political instability and engender other weak spots that can be exploited by malign foreign influence. That would be bad in any case. Combined with Russia’s unabated desire to control Georgia, it is a very serious national security threat. Consequently, the next Georgian general election can become a decisive moment for both Georgia’s democracy and its sovereignty.
Then there is the bigger picture, reaching beyond the concerns of the current moment. Globally, democracy and liberty are being challenged by formidable forces, including major powers such as China and Russia. The years ahead will be defined by the struggle between these forces and the free world. Advances in technology that have so drastically changed our lives, and which are set to keep changing them in the future, have made the stakes in this struggle incredibly high. The Communists and the Nazis of the 20th century would have loved to be able to exercise as full of a control over their subjugated societies as is now made possible by modern technology. They did not have such an opportunity but modern tyrannies do. The logic of regime preservation motivates them to use it as China’s example so vividly shows.
Winston Churchill’s warning about the terrors that can be brought “by the lights of perverted science” has never been as relevant as it is today. Dystopias threaten to step out of the realm of science fiction into our real lives. At this juncture, it is particularly important for Georgia to stay on the right side of the geopolitical divide that is developing between the free and the unfree parts of the world. Georgia tried and failed to achieve this for most of the 20th century. It would be a tragedy if Georgia failed again in our own age.
No major power in the history of civilization has been free from committing wrongs while operating in the international arena. The United States is no exception. Yet America’s overall record in terms of world history has been overwhelmingly positive – especially since its adversaries in the struggle for global primacy have had an intensely detrimental agenda for the peoples they were trying to dominate and for the world in general. America contested the European hegemony of Imperial Germany and the Asian hegemony of Imperial Japan. It played a critical role in the defeat of Nazi Germany and did not allow the worldwide spread of totalitarian horrors, which tragically Georgia was fully subjected to, by the Soviet Union.
This pattern continues in our times as there is little besides the United States that stands between China and world primacy while America is also the main obstacle on the way for other modern imperial contenders - Russia and Iran - to the fulfillment of their own expansionist ambitions. Indeed, the men who sat in the Pennsylvania State House on 4 July 1776 did a favor not just to their compatriots in their own time but to a much greater number of people – in many parts of the world and in subsequent epochs.
The Georgian people need and want help from their foreign friends to preserve and strengthen their democracy in the present politically decisive moment that Georgia is facing. They also need and wish to ensure their country’s long-term geopolitical place in the free world. A close partnership with the United States and the American help and support, are of the utmost importance in this regard.
For its part, America has a pragmatic interest to engage with Georgia and help it retain its freedom. Due to the facts of physical and political geography, Georgia has strategic importance – which is one of the main reasons it gets attacked so viciously by Russia. If Moscow were to dominate Georgia, Azerbaijan would lose its strategic access to its ally Turkey and to the West. It is difficult to see how it would be able to stay out of the Russian sphere of imperial influence if it were to find itself so geopolitically isolated. A fall of Georgia would also mean Russian control over the South Caucasus transportation corridor – one of the routes connecting Asia and Europe, and a competition for the existing or potential routes running through the territories of Russia and Iran. Central Asia would lose its only potential outlet to the West. In addition, Russia would be able to fully consolidate its influence over Armenia.
In sum, Georgia’s subjugation would effectively give Moscow control over the whole South Caucasus with all of the consequent strategic implications. This would be of great benefit to Russia’s revisionist imperialism and detrimental to the objectives of the United States, among others. Nations, including democratic ones, must base most of their international activities on national interest. America’s crucial support for Georgia over many years testifies to the fact that the survival of Georgia’s sovereignty and democracy is understood by many Americans, including foreign policy decision makers, to be in their country’s interests.
There is a synergy between Georgia’s quest to preserve its sovereignty, America’s pragmatic interest and the general cause of freedom and democracy. A continued and increasingly close partnership between the United States and the Georgian people will serve both sound geopolitics and the ideals on which the free world of today has been built.
- In line for the candidate status, Georgia will get a European perspective. What are we worried about?
- The War and Georgia
- Ukraine will soon embark on a path of practical integration into the European Union. What about Georgia?
- NATO’s possible expansion in Northern Europe and its significance for Georgia and Ukraine
- Abkhazia in 2021: Energy Crisis, New “Minister” and Political Controversy
- US-Russia Relations and the Issue of Ukraine
- What are the Prospects of the Eastern Partnership Summit Set on 15 December?
- What Lies Behind the Growing Cooperation of the Georgian and Hungarian Governments
- Vaccination: “To Be, or not to Be”…
- Can Georgia use China to balance Russia?
- Belarus’ exit from the Eastern Partnership and what to expect next
- Pacta Sunt Servanda: Agreements must be kept
- The West vs Russia: The Reset once again?!
- Associated Trio, What is Next?
- The Cyber-Dimension of the Geneva Summit
- Europe in Anticipation of the Results of a “Harmful Deal”
- What Should Georgia Expect from the NATO Summit
- The Issue of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali Region in the Context of NATO and European Union Membership
- USA, Liberal International Order, Challenges of 2021, and Georgia
- What does US President Joe Biden’s Recognition of the Armenian Genocide Imply?
- Georgia's transit opportunities, novelties and challenges against the backdrop of the pandemic
- Georgia’s Application for European Union Membership
- A New Dawn for Transatlantic Relations under Biden’s Presidency: What Are the Hopes for Georgia?
- Biden’s Conundrum
- COVID 19 Pandemic Economic Crisis and Reducing the Instability of Georgia’s National Currency
- Escalation of the Karabakh Conflict: Threats and Challenges for Georgia
- Georgia’s European Way During the Period of Pandemic Deglobalization
- Independence of Georgia and the Historic Responsibility of Our Generation
- Complications Caused by the Coronavirus in Turkey and Their Influence on Georgia
- “Elections” in Abkhazia: New “President’s” Revanche and Challenges
- Consumer Crisis in the Tskhinvali Region: Food for Thought
- Georgians Fighting the Same Battle 99 Years Later
- Georgian Defense – Political Paradox and the Vicious Circle of Not Having a System
- Why It Matters: Georgia’s 'Troll Scandal' Explained
- What Will the New Dialogue Format with Russia Bring for Georgia?
- On the “Russian Culture Center” in Georgia
- Whither Economic Policy?
- Massive Cyberattacks On Georgia Calls For Defense And Resilience
- What do we know about the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the Russian Federation and Georgia?
- What is the Connection between NATO and Reclaiming Abkhazia?
- Georgia's Problems are not Addressed at G7 Meetings: Who is to Blame?
- Vladimir Putin’s Main Messages in his Interview with the Financial Times
- Dugin has Come Out as a Supporter of Georgia – How Did This Happen?
- The Outcome of the European Parliament Elections - What Does it Mean for Georgia?
- Deterring Russia
- Why Local Elections of March 31, 2019 in Turkey are Important?
- Does the Principle of Strategic Partnership Work in Ukraine-Georgia Relations?
- A New Chance for Circular Labor Migration between Georgia and the EU
- Georgia’s Trade with Electricity: The Influence of Bitcoin
- Georgia’s External Trade: How to Strengthen Positive Trends
- The Risk of the Renewal of the Karabakh Conflict after the Velvet Revolution in Armenia
- Why It Is Necessary to Know the Day the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 Started
- Georgia’s Position in the Westernization Index 2018
- Why Did the Results of the G7 Summit in Charlevoix not Meet Our Expectations?
- The Ben Hodges Model – a Real Way for Georgia’s Membership in NATO
- Why did the Foreign Ministers of G7 not remember Georgia during their 23 April 2018 Toronto Meeting?
- Georgia and the American Strategy
- Putin’s Pre-Election Economic Promises: Myth and Reality
- Trade of Electricity: Successes of 2016, Reality of 2017 and Future Prospects– the Impact of Bitcoin (Part Two)
- Let Geneva Stay the Way it is
- Trade of Electricity: Successes of 2016, Reality of 2017 and Future Prospects – the Impact of Bitcoin (Part One)
- Turkey’s Military Operation in Afrin – a New Phase in the Syrian Conflict
- Geopolitical Vision of the Russian Opposition
- Dangers Originating from Russia and Georgia’s Security System
- Eurasian Custom Union and problems of Russian – Georgian FTA
- What Awaits the People of Gali?
- Disrupt and Distract: Russia’s Methodology of Dealing with the West
- Trojan Horse Model IL- 76 or Why Would Russia Want to Fight Georgia’s Forest Fires
- Russian Diplomats in Georgia – who are they, how many of them are there and what are they up to
- Is it Acceptable for Georgia to Declare Neutrality?
- Georgia’s European Perspective in the Context of EU’s Future Evolution
- Brexit Negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom have been re-launched: What will be their Influence on Georgia?
- Kremlin’s Policy in the Occupied Regions of Georgia Moves to a New Stage
- Turkey’s Domestic and Foreign Policy in the Context of Regional Security
- Post-Soviet States – Struggle for the Legitimation of Power
- Current Foreign Policy of Georgia: How Effective is it in Dealing with the Existing Challenges?
- Military Resilience - a Needed Factor for NATO-Partners
- Observations on the Agreement Reached with Gazprom
- New Russian Weaponry in the Caucasus and Its Impact on Georgia’s NATO Aspiration