The Helsinki Summit and its General Results
Author: Giorgi Bilanishvili, Research Fellow, Rondeli Foundation
In recent times, the Helsinki Summit held on July 16 has been a hot topic in international politics. The meeting was indeed noteworthy and unordinary. The simple fact that Presidents Trump and Putin met for over 2 hours behind closed doors with no one but translators present attests to this. Only after this did the meeting that involved each country’s delegations and actually resembled a more standard, internationally accepted format begin.
The Helsinki Summit confirmed once again that Washington and Moscow have quite differing views on many issues of international politics. As expected, it also became evident that improving US-Russia relations is no easy feat. Nothing of the sort happened at the Helsinki Summit and it didn’t even show any signs that this process could be underway. Despite the stated interest of Russia, there was no joint declaration made at the summit as it was limited to just a joint press conference, which once again highlighted the significant difference in positions.
It became evident from comments made after the summit and other publicized information that many issues were discussed at the summit. Among these were such major international matters such as the conflict in Eastern Ukraine, denuclearization of North Korea, the Iran Nuclear Deal and others.
Based on statements made during the press conference held after the summit, two major topics emerged, which could become subjects of US-Russia negotiations. They are: non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and Syria. Below, we will try to evaluate these matters in more detail.
Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
President Putin said at the press conference that the US side was given a package of specific proposals on matters of strategic stability and non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It is likely to include an extension to an agreement on “Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty” which expires in 2021. In addition, it should be assumed that the aforementioned package also includes Moscow’s position on the “Antiballistic Missile” (ABM) agreement, which the US left back in 2001, during George W. Bush’s administration.
Russia believes that the absence of the ABM agreement allowed the United States to push for missile defense systems in Poland and Romania. Moscow estimates that these systems are directed against Russia. Consequently, it raises the issue of neutralizing this process and having the US return to the ABM agreement quite frequently.
Moscow’s attempts, however, have been so far unsuccessful because neither the Bush nor the Obama administrations considered this matter and despite the fact that Trump’s approach to Russia are quite different from his predecessors’, it should be noted that returning to the ABM agreement has not been considered during his presidency either.
It appears that the issue of Assad was not discussed at the meeting because neither Trump nor Putin made any mention of it during the press conference. The main issue was related to Israel’s security concerns with regards to control of the Golan Heights and the strengthening of Iran’s position in Syria.
President Putin said at the press conference that “Also, crushing terrorists in the southwest of Syria: The south of Syria should be brought to the full compliance with the treaty of 1974 about the separation of forces, about separation of forces of Israel and Syria. This will bring peace to Golan Heights.”
The fact that this issue would be front and center during the Helsinki Summit was evident even prior to the summit because Moscow held high-level consultations with Israel and the Iranian side.
Apparently, Israel is not satisfied with the situation, because shortly after the Helsinki Summit, it was reported that Israel downed a Syrian military plane near the Golan Heights.
In addition, a Russian delegation headed by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and also including the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, Valery Gerasimov, visited Tel-Aviv on July 23. The delegation held a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli delegation also included the Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman, National Security Adviser Meir Ben-Shabbat and IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot.
Moscow is apparently well aware that Israel’s security concern is one of the key issues in the Syrian crisis. It is also clear that Israel is not going to step back on this matter. It is also unlikely that any kind of concession can be received from President Trump, who is a staunch supporter of Israel. It is also debatable, whether Moscow has any solid leverage to force Iran to take Israel’s interests into consideration.
Other Important Issues
In addition to the aforementioned, there may be some other important conclusions that can be made from the summit itself and subsequent developments on the periphery.
It has been proved that there is high resistance in the US to normalization of relations with Russia. Not only members of the opposition, but also Republican congressmen who are typically hesitant to criticize the president, made sharp critical statements against him. It should be mentioned that even FOX News, which has a reputation for offering unwavering support to the Republican Party and Trump personally, was critical of the US president.
This criticism initially forced Trump to make a statement “clarifying” certain remarks he made at the press conference with Vladimir Putin on Russia’s meddling in the 2016 US presidential election, and subsequently it forced the American president to reschedule a meeting with Putin that should have been held in Washington in October at Trump’s invitation for next year.
Trump’s Russia policy has been criticized beyond political establishments and media outlets – according to polls, Trump’s Russia policy has little support, and this is no small matter ahead of the Congressional mid-term elections scheduled for November.
As for Russia, one thing has been clearly shown: Russia is still loudly declaring that Western sanctions have not hurt it and it is not going to revise its foreign policy decisions, but at a minimum, it is obviously uncomfortable. Consequently, Russia is trying to achieve some type of breakthrough, to improve relations with the West, and most importantly, get sanctions removed. This is not going to be an easy task, because Moscow is not going to make concessions in Ukraine, or in its foreign-policy interests in general. Thus, the prospect of a breakthrough in relations between the West and Russia looks as bleak after the Helsinki summit, as it did before it.
- Moldova’s challenges alongside the war in Ukraine
- Is Israel's New Government Shifting its Policy towards the Russia-Ukraine War?
- What does Russia want from Georgia?
- The Ninth Package of Sanctions - in Response to the Russian Escalation and Missile Attacks
- The Danger Russia’s Neighbors May Face after the Russo-Ukrainian War
- Belarus and Russia deepen trade and economic relations with occupied Abkhazia: A prerequisite for recognition of Abkhazia's “independence”?
- "Captured emotions" - Russian propaganda
- The Eighth Package of Sanctions - Response to Russian Annexation and Illegal Referendums
- What’s next for Italy’s foreign policy after Giorgia Meloni’s victory?
- Lukashenko's Visit to Occupied Abkhazia: Review and Assessments
- War in Ukraine and Russia’s declining role in the Karabakh peace process
- What issues were discussed at the Putin-Erdogan meeting?
- The Russian Exclave of Kaliningrad and the Lithuanian "Sting"
- Seventh Package of Sanctions and Embargo on Russian Gold
- What could be the cost of “Putin’s face-saving” for European relations
- Failed Tskhinvali Referendum
- The War and Georgia
- "Autocratic Peace"
- “Rural Orbanism”- Polarization as a determinant for Hungary's political future
- Illegal Presidential Elections in the Tskhinvali Region: Why Bibilov Lost and What to Anticipate in Future
- How to Respond to Russian Ultra-Orthodox-Historic-Hegemonism?
- The War in Ukraine and the UK’s New Role in Eastern Europe
- What Will the Abolition of the OSCE Minsk Group Bring to the South Caucasus?
- Why Has the Abkhaz Side Become More Active on Social Networks?
- Why a Neutral Ukraine Is Not on Putin’s Mind (Ukraine’s Neutral Status Is Getting Closer, but What Does It Mean to Putin?)
- Europe's energy future - challenges and opportunities
- Uncontrolled Mass Immigration and the Position of the Georgian Government
- Changes in Putin's propaganda narratives since the Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Positions and Actions of Turkey in the Russo-Ukrainian War
- NATO’s possible expansion in Northern Europe and its significance for Georgia and Ukraine
- Political Winter Olympics in Beijing
- What Is behind Putin’s Sudden Gambit in Ukraine?
- L'Europe pourra-t-elle éviter le “déjà vu” ? (France, President of the Council of the European Union, and the Tensions in Eastern Europe)
- US-Russia Relations and the Issue of Ukraine
- The New Targets of Ramzan Kadyrov’s Regime
- What Will the Post-Merkel Era Mean for the EU’s Russia and Eastern Neighbourhood Policy?
- What Lies Behind the Growing Cooperation of the Georgian and Hungarian Governments
- “Doberman” as a Minister: Inal Ardzinba’s Prospects and Challenges
- The Belarus Crisis: How to Enhance Our Resilience Against the Russian Strategy for Its Near-Neighborhood
- Moldova’s Gas Crisis Has Been Russia’s Yet Another Political Blackmailing
- Belarus One Year On: An Insecure Regime Under Russian “Protection”
- Russia’s Parliamentary Elections - What Can Be Said About the Regime’s Stability
- Can Georgia use China to balance Russia?
- The West vs Russia: The Reset once again?!
- Formation of a New “Political Elite” in Abkhazia - Who Will Replace the Old “Elite?”
- The Cyber-Dimension of the Geneva Summit
- Securitization of the Arctic: A Looming Threat of Melting Ice
- Europe in Anticipation of the Results of a “Harmful Deal”
- (Re)Mapping the EU’s Relations with Russia: Time for Change?
- USA, Liberal International Order, Challenges of 2021, and Georgia
- The Political Crisis in Moldova: A Deadlock without the Way Out?
- Russia's Testing or Bullying?
- ‘Vaccine Diplomacy’: A New Opportunity for Global Authoritarian Influence?
- The End of the Russian Natural Gas Monopoly in Balkans
- Who did the judge sentence: Navalny, Putin or Russia?
- 2020 Developments in Abkhazia: “Elections,” the Pandemic and Deeper Integration with Russia
- Could Belarus Become a Prelude to the Great Polish-Swedish War 400 Years Ago?
- Vladimir Putin's Annual Grand Press Conference - Notable Elements and Messages
- Russia’s Energy Policy in the Tskhinvali Region
- Who Won and Who Lost with the War in Karabakh?
- What Russia has Gained in Karabakh
- What Armenia Did and Did not Lose as a Result of the Ceasefire Declaration in Karabakh
- Protests in Belarus, Lukashenko and the Russian Federation
- Some Thoughts on the Use of the Term „Post-Soviet Space“
- Khabarovsk Krai Protests as an Indicator of the Russian Federation’s Stability
- Trio Pandemic Propaganda: How China, Russia and Iran Are Targeting the West
- From Russia with… a Canny Plan
- “Elections” in Abkhazia: New “President’s” Revanche and Challenges
- Georgians Fighting the Same Battle 99 Years Later
- Confrontation between Russia and Turkey in Syria
- Political Crisis in Occupied Abkhazia
- What is the Significance of Killing General Qasem Soleimani?
- What Will the New Dialogue Format with Russia Bring for Georgia?
- On the “Russian Culture Center” in Georgia
- Main Messages of Russian Propaganda
- What do we know about the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the Russian Federation and Georgia?
- New Focuses of the Anti-Occupation Policy
- Vladimir Putin’s Main Messages in his Interview with the Financial Times
- Georgia and Russia’s Post-modern Fascism
- Dugin has Come Out as a Supporter of Georgia – How Did This Happen?
- Deterring Russia
- On NATO, Russia and Pat Buchanan
- Modern Russia’s Own Wars of Religion
- What Does the U.S. Withdrawal from Syria Signify?
- Bolton’s visit to Moscow– what to expect in U.S-Russia relations?
- The Risk of the Renewal of the Karabakh Conflict after the Velvet Revolution in Armenia
- The Situation in Syria’s Idlib Province, Interests of the Parties and Threats
- Why It Is Necessary to Know the Day the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 Started
- Georgia’s Position in the Westernization Index 2018
- Why Did the Results of the G7 Summit in Charlevoix not Meet Our Expectations?
- How to Win Cold War 2.0
- The Russian “Ambassador’s” Rotation in Abkhazia
- Why did the Foreign Ministers of G7 not remember Georgia during their 23 April 2018 Toronto Meeting?
- Georgia and the American Strategy
- Women from Georgia in Syrian Conflict and their Future
- Putin’s Pre-Election Economic Promises: Myth and Reality
- Let Geneva Stay the Way it is
- Turkey’s Military Operation in Afrin – a New Phase in the Syrian Conflict
- Kremlin New Appointments and the Occupied Regions of Georgia
- Dangers Originating from Russia and Georgia’s Security System
- Eurasian Custom Union and problems of Russian – Georgian FTA
- Is Georgia’s Export Growth Sustainable?
- The 2017 Eastern Partnership Summit and its Results
- Russia’s Influence over the Field of Security in Tskhinvali Region is Growing: Support for Full Integration
- The Issue of Iraqi Kurdistan in the Context of Regional Security
- What Awaits the People of Gali?
- Growth of Military Spending and Relations with Russia: Azerbaijan trying to Gain Advantage over Armenia
- Disrupt and Distract: Russia’s Methodology of Dealing with the West
- Russian Diplomats in Georgia – who are they, how many of them are there and what are they up to
- Putin’s Visit to the Occupied Abkhazia: Was our Reaction Actually Adequate?
- Is it Acceptable for Georgia to Declare Neutrality?
- How to Stop the “Creeping Occupation”
- Kremlin’s Policy in the Occupied Regions of Georgia Moves to a New Stage
- Syrian Civil War in the Context of Regional Security
- The Winnable Second Round of Russia’s Neighbors’ Struggle against Its Imperialism
- Parliamentary Elections in Armenia – The Triumph of the Governing Party
- Current Foreign Policy of Georgia: How Effective is it in Dealing with the Existing Challenges?
- Observations on the Agreement Reached with Gazprom
- New Russian Weaponry in the Caucasus and Its Impact on Georgia’s NATO Aspiration